Competitive Landscape · Confidential

Kinetic Interception of Group 1–3 UAVs.
Who actually delivers — and how Citadel wins.

A focused view of the global field for autonomous, kinetic and explosive interception of small-to-medium unmanned aerial threats. RF jamming, microwave, and laser systems are explicitly out of scope. This is a kinetic-only league table — sorted by combat proof, autonomy, and unit economics.

Scope: Group 1–3 UAS · < 1,320 lb · < FL180
Modality: Kinetic / explosive interception only
Updated: June 2026
Audience: SAFE round investors
UAS Group 1
< 20 lb · < 1,200 ft AGL · < 100 kts — quadcopters, FPV, Mavic-class
UAS Group 2
21–55 lb · < 3,500 ft AGL · < 250 kts — small ISR drones, Lancet-class
UAS Group 3
< 1,320 lb · < 18,000 ft MSL · < 250 kts — Shahed-136, ScanEagle-class
Not in this analysis
RF jammers, HPM/microwave, lasers, gun-based AAA, surface-to-air missiles
League Table

Direct competitors — autonomous kinetic interceptors

Nine players actively pursuing kinetic interception of Group 1–3 UAS. Of those, only two are combat-proven with autonomous engagement — and only one is deployed by a tier‑1 Western military at scale.

Company / Product Autonomous Combat-Proven Cost / Intercept Notable Contract Notes
Tehiru Us
Citadel / SharkOS
Yes
End-to-end autonomy. AI kill-chain in ms.
Yes
IDF-deployed · operational kills
~$5K
Elbit Nova Shield — operational
95% intercept rate (short-range)
Detection-agnostic. Full stack: Hive launcher + interceptor + SharkOS. Sub-$5K kill economics.
Anduril
Anvil
Yes
Autonomous engagement via Lattice
No
No public combat data
~$5K–$15K (est.)
USMC MADIS — $200M (Nov 2024) → $642M / 10yr (Mar 2025)
Base defense; initial $9.5M FY24 funding
Low-collateral kinetic interceptor for small UAS. Bundled with Lattice C2 + Pulsar EW.
Anduril
Roadrunner-M
Yes No
No public combat data
~$500K / unit
"Low hundreds of thousands" per Anduril
DoD — $250M / 500+ units (Oct 2024)
Kuwait FMS request — up to $2B (Anvil-K + Roadrunner-M)
High-explosive jet-powered interceptor; reusable if not expended. Group 3-class threats.
Project Eagle Eric Schmidt
Merops / Surveyor
Yes
Autonomous or Xbox-piloted
Yes
Ukraine — 1,000+ Shahed intercepts
~$15K → $3–5K at scale
US Army — 13,000 units (Apr 2026, 8-day procurement)
Deploying to Middle East vs. Iranian drones
Kinetic collision / proximity. 4-person crew. Closest cost peer; minimal autonomy depth.
TYTAN Technologies €30M Series A
Interceptor-S
Partial
CV guidance; Brave1-tested
No
Not combat-proven
Undisclosed
€30M Series A (Feb 2026)
KNDS Boxer integration · Hensoldt · Dedrone · Mercedes-Benz
EU sovereign play. Range >15 km, >250 km/h. Target: 3,000/mo by end 2026.
Quantum Systems / WIY Drones
STRILA-2
Yes
AI guidance by WIY Drones
No
Pre-deployment
Undisclosed
15,000 units — Ukraine National Guard (Mar 2026)
German government-funded
Rocket-booster variant for rapid altitude. EU/UA industrial collaboration model.
Mach Industries
Dart
Unknown
Marketed as autonomous
No
New entrant (Jan 2026)
Undisclosed
No disclosed contract
In-theater intercepts targeted by 2026
Group 1–3 swarm defense pitch. End-to-end system (sense, C2, engage). Vertically integrated.
Wild Hornets
Sting
No
Manual FPV pilot
Yes
3,000+ Ukraine kills
~$300–$500
Ukraine MoD — volume program
High-volume, low-tech
Cheapest per-unit. Pilot-bottlenecked, single-target — not a scalable Western solution.
Fortem Technologies
DroneHunter F700 (net)
Yes No
Security events only
~$50K–$100K
Limited security deployments
Stadiums · critical infrastructure
Net-capture (non-explosive). Group 1 only. Civil/security market; not a battlefield solution.

Scope filter: kinetic and explosive intercept only. RF jammers (Dedrone, DroneShield), high-power microwave (Epirus Leonidas), and laser systems (DragonFire, Lockheed HELIOS, Rafael Iron Beam) are out of scope for this analysis and not directly comparable.

Strategic Positioning

Where Citadel sits — and why no one else is there.

Plotted by autonomy depth (Y) and cost-per-intercept efficiency (X). The upper-right is where mass-drone-threat economics actually work. Tehiru is the only player combining full kill-chain autonomy with sub-$5K unit economics — and the only one of those that is combat-proven.

Win Zone
Cost Efficiency — Lower $/Intercept →
Autonomy Depth →
High $
Low $
Full autonomy
Manual / piloted
Roadrunner-M
Fortem
Anvil
STRILA-2
Merops
Dart
TYTAN
Sting
★ Tehiru / Citadel
Read direction → upper-right = winning
Right = lower cost-per-intercept  ·  Up = deeper autonomy

Positions reflect publicly available data and analyst estimates. Combat-proven status is not encoded on the axes — but Tehiru and Project Eagle / Merops are the only two players in the cost-efficient autonomous zone with confirmed operational kills. Tehiru's edge is the depth of the autonomy stack and detection-agnostic integration on top of that.

The Defensible Wedge

Four things only Citadel delivers — together.

01

Combat-Proven Autonomy

IDF-deployed operationally with end-to-end autonomous engagement. Anvil, Roadrunner-M, TYTAN, STRILA-2, and Dart are autonomous on paper — Tehiru is the only one with confirmed operational kills via full autonomous kill-chain.

02

Sub-$5K Kill Economics

At ~$5,000 per intercept, Citadel matches the cost floor of Project Eagle's Merops but adds a deeper autonomy stack and detection-agnostic integration. Anduril Roadrunner-M is ~100× more expensive per shot. Sting is cheaper but human-piloted.

03

Detection-Agnostic Platform

SharkOS integrates into any sensor stack — radar, RF, EO/IR. Anduril Anvil is locked to Lattice. TYTAN ships only with Hensoldt + Dedrone. Tehiru wins by sitting on top of existing infrastructure, not replacing it.

04

Full-Stack — Hive + Interceptor + OS

One vendor delivers the launcher (Hive), the interceptor drone, and the autonomy software. Most competitors are point-solutions inside a larger integrator's stack — Tehiru is the integrator.

Of the nine credible kinetic-interception players globally, only Tehiru ships combat-proven autonomy at sub-$5K per kill — with a detection-agnostic, full-stack platform already in operational deployment.

SAFE Round · Confidential · June 2026

Sources & References